Jonathan Eyre Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 I'd like to share with everyone a recent report by the AMRC set out to Untangle the Requirements of a Digital Twin defining and justifying a digital twin to be A live digital coupling of the state of a physical asset or process to a virtual representation with a functional output. This is an accumulation of the research AMRC has been doing in this space over several years working both with multiple sectors of industry and academic institutions so I'm keen to hear your thoughts on the approach taken to breakdown the requirements of having a digital twin defined in this way. Does it match your approaches to having a digital twin? Where do you find the emphasis being of deploying such systems? https://www.amrc.co.uk/pages/digital-twin-report For those of you unfamiliar with the work AMRC are doing in the digital twin space, a few cascading findings and metrics still stem from a previous report back from 2018. https://www.amrc.co.uk/files/document/219/1536919984_HVM_CATAPULT_DIGITAL_TWIN_DL.pdf AMRC_Digital_Twin_AW.pdf 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now